Wednesday, July 29, 2009

The unrest in South Africa's townships are due to broken promises. More than one person, interviewed on tv, claimed that they had been promised houses. These are people living in shacks and would never have the money to pay for one square yard of land never mind an entire house. This means that some politician had promised free houses to poor people to get votes. This seems to be the pattern across the entire developing world. Institutions such as the World Bank say that poor people must be lifted out of poverty. The only way to do so is to educate every child in the country. Unfortunately it is the poor who continue to produce large number of children when they clearly cannot afford to feed, clothe and educate them. The reason they produce so many is that they can send the children out to work and enjoy their earnings. They do not see any advantage in education. After twelve years of school and four years of college the child may earn a lot but may not share with his parents so the parents opt for profit now rather than uncertain wealth in the future. Poor uneducated people have no regard for their children, their country or the climate. They want to squeeze as much out of the system and their ever increasing numbers mean that crooked politicians will promise whatever they want. Clearly this cannot go on. No country can go on throwing freebies at ever increasing poor. China recognised the danger and forced a one child policy derided by every pundit and bleeding heart. This may be why China has managed to grow at 9% even in such a severe recession. The Chinese may be like cockroaches but there may be something to learn even from them.

2 comments:

procrasty said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
procrasty said...

the Chinese policy has already revealed its most severe flaw: they will have a HUGE aged population in just a few years time - their growth spurt will, of necessity, be very short lived. and this is aside from other problems such as the sale of chinese babies by families exceeding the quota...

and it is human nature - atleast every human being who is not forced to do otherwise does so - to choose the path of least resistance. thus, if no one is really forcing you to get "educated", you will not (refer truancy laws in the west). instead you will seek other means to just survive. also, as long as people are able to match the living standards of their immediate neighbours, they dont much care about upgrading further - the competition is with the Joneses next door, not with the Joneses around the world. (one can go into a detailed sociological/psychological explanation of why this is - but most simply put, if everyone's jumping into the well then it seems a reasonable choice and a bad idea not to do the same. and one's data set for "everyone" includes, primarily, one's immediate neighbours: the safety-in-numbers theory) hence, to expect that poor people will behave any differently from other poor people around them is pointless. unless you can change the mindset of a majority of the poor at once.

finally, it really matters what you mean by "education" - education, as is available in most countries today, is a means of conditioning an individual to be of benefit to the economic system and fit in with a particular structure of society, thereby deriving some benefit for him/herself. this also inherently means that an individual "educated" in a particular manner ensures the survival and propagation of a particular system of organisation of human beings and means of concieving the world a.k.a. of a particular society.