"India will not participate in the International Energy Agency's (IEA) proposal to release strategic petroleum reserves (SPR) to stabilize global oil markets," because "The crisis (that led to a rise in prices) is not our creation. Those responsible have to deal with it and create situations to ease (prices)." India will continue to export refined fuels as we have "reasonably" comfortable stocks of petrol, diesel and aviation turbine fuel. TOI. On the other hand, "India allocated Rs 58.76 billion for this financial year to fill and expand its SPR but is expected to spend only Rs 10.39 billion of it - and has budgeted a mere Rs 2 billion for next year - leaving emergency stockpiles partially empty and expansion plans stalled, Budget documents show." SPR capacity is about two-thirds full and "The government's oft-cited figure of 9.5 days of crude cover from SPR assumes the caverns are full and is based on 2019-20 consumption figures." HT. Lying their heads off, aren't they?. "The Donald Trump administration of the United States yet again called India 'good actors' after 'permitting' New Delhi to buy Russian oil amid the West Asian crisis." DH. Yes Massa (dictionary). Much obliged. "The US has earlier claimed that India had stopped buying Russian oil as part of the trade deal that reduced tariffs on exports to Washington." "For India, which imports most of its oil, the combination of soaring crude prices, a weakening rupee and falling equity markets represents a triple shock." If the conflict drags on, "the impact could extend beyond financial markets into inflation, fiscal balances, corporate earnings and economic growth." ET. Inflation is under control because of weak domestic demand and soft commodity prices. Even so, "The rupee, the worst-performing Asian currency, has tumbled 9% against the dollar. This has happened even with the greenback losing ground elsewhere." "Additionally, nine million Indians work in the Persian Gulf, providing critical remittances," wrote Andy Mukherjee. The reality is that, "Even as tensions escalate across West Asia, queues outside visa application centers for Gulf countries in Delhi show little sign of slowing, with many workers saying that economic compulsions leave them little choice." ET. "Without money we will die here as well," said Dilip Yadav from Bihar. "The dual petroleum dependency: Indian households now depend on Petroleum products for both cooking (LPG) and transport (petrol, diesel, fares). Together LPG + Conveyance account for 7.5-10.2% of monthly budgets," said Shamika Ravi. That is one-tenth of monthly expense. A comparison of household monthly consumption with total income from the Periodic Labor Force Survey (PLFS) showed that 26.4% spent more than what they earned, wrote Abhishek Jha & Roshan Kishore. No reserves with the government, no reserves with households. Exposed by the conflict.
India Dying.
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
Monday, March 09, 2026
Looks like scorched earth.
Sunday, March 08, 2026
Unsecured growth.
Saturday, March 07, 2026
Trying to be humane.
Friday, March 06, 2026
Any new ideas?
"The ongoing conflict in the Middle East could pose short-term challenges for the India economy by pushing up oil prices and disrupting trade flows, though the country's long-term growth trajectory is unlikely to be significantly affected, according to Nagesh Kumar, external member of the Monetary Policy Committed of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)." TOI. Not just oil, "Qatar, India's largest supplier of India's natural gas, has declared force majeure on deliveries following a halt in production in the wake of an Iranian drone strike - a disruption that has led to a cut in supplies to Indian industry by up to 40%, sources said." ET. "Adani Total Gas has sharply raised prices for supplies to industrial clients," and "Lower gas supplies have marginally hit production at some Indian fertiliser companies." Reuters. The cost of buying fuel for Indian consumers not only depends on the selling price of oil in dollars but also the buying price in rupees which, in turn, depends on the exchange rate of the two currencies. The rupee hit a low of 92.123 against the US dollar on 4 March but hardened to 91.933 yesterday. investing.com. "The central bank was apparently judiciously selling the greenback in the last 10-15 sessions,..as the RBI was looking to protect the Rs 91 level," but now "the RBI will look to safeguard the psychological Rs 92 per dollar level, and could continue selling the greenback in both the onshore and off-shore non-deliverable forward (NDF) market to maintain the current level." MC. Spending dollars on buying more expensive oil and gas and on defending the rupee will increase our current account deficit (CAD). Already, "The CAD stood at $13.2 billion, or 1.3% of GDP in the third quarter (September-December) of the fiscal year 2025-26, compared to $11.3 billion, or 1.1% of GDP, a year earlier.' Reuters. The GDP, using better methodology, was updated to base year 2022-23 from 2011-12, showed India's nominal GDP at Rs Rs 345.47 trillion compared to Rs 357.14 trillion using the previous method. A smaller nominal GDP could result in lower tax collections and raise the fiscal deficit to 4.51% from 4.36% of GDP, wrote Pragya Srivastava & Payal Bhattacharya. Crude oil prices collapsed from $132.83 per barrel in July 2008 to $29.78 per barrel in January 2016 and, apart from a brief period between February and October 2022, has stayed well below $90 per barrel. indexmundi.com. Mr Narendra Modi first came to power in May 2014 (wikipedia) and soft prices of crude oil allowed him to rake in a total of around Rs 40 trillion by raising taxes on retail fuel sales in India (ppac.gov.in). The government may have to lower taxes on retail fuel to keep prices constant, which would result in a tax shortfall, or pass on higher costs to consumers, which would instantly add to the cost of transport and raise prices all round. Higher inflation reduces the value of the rupee and could result in further weakening of the currency. Apart from selling dollars, does the RBI have any other ideas? Would it share them with us? Just asking..
Thursday, March 05, 2026
The most propitious time.
"A US submarine sank an Iranian warship off the southern coast of Sri Lanka, killing dozens of sailors," as, "Sri Lanka's deputy foreign minister identified the warship as the frigate IRIS Dena and said it was heading back to Iran from an eastern Indian port." Reuters. Dena "had recently participated in International Fleet Review 2026, a military exercise hosted by India." "Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US 'had "perpetrated an atrocity at sea, 2,000 miles away from Iran's shore'." BBC. "When the US and Israel launched their coordinated strikes against Iran last Saturday, the operation was framed as swift and decisive." "A report by Politico based on an internal Pentagon notification indicates that US Central Command has requested additional intelligence officers to support operations against Iran for at least 100 days - and potentially through September." ET. If true, the Politico is spying on its own armed forces, and if untrue, it is spreading fake news, while hiding behind the myth of "protecting the source". Four days ago, two Iranian SU-24 tactical bombers came within "two minutes" of the largest US Air Base at al-Udeid, housing 10,000 US service members, before Qatari planes shot them down, two sources told CNN. This is plain scare-mongering. Impossible to beat the left-wing US media for treachery. There were no such attempts when then President Barack Obama illegally used a UN mandate to enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, purely to protect civilians (press.un.org), to launch an all out attack, lasting over eight months (wikipedia), murdering 30,000 civilians and wounding another 50,000 (The Guardian). Despite repeated denials, Iran was definitely producing enough enriched uranium to produce nuclear weapons. Iran had an agreement with the Obama administration to enrich uranium up to 3.67% and maintain a stockpile of 300 kg. In reality, "The IAEA put Iran's stockpile at 9,874.9 kg before the start of the 12-day Israel-Iran war last June, with 440 kg of uranium enriched up to 60%." "That would allow Iran to build several nuclear weapons." Independent. In 2018, "Saudi Arabia has warned that it will develop its own nuclear weapons if regional rival Iran acquires one." BBC. Last year, "Israel eliminated key Iranian military and scientific personnel, degraded the country's military infrastructure, and neutralized its early warning system." "The outcome was the result of years of sustained intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance dominance, and deep operational infiltration." hudson.org. If Israel feared that Iran was arming missiles with nuclear explosives it could have attacked Iran with its own nuclear weapons. The result would have been a catastrophic destruction of the Gulf region with permanent nuclear contamination, a meteoric rise in oil prices and a collapse of the global economy lasting decades. With the Hezbollah yet to recover from the pager attacks of 2024 (wikipedia), the killing of the elusive Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah (wikipedia), Hamas not daring to peep above the tunnels, and a Sunni government in Syria in place of the minority Alawite regime of Bashar al-Assad (BBC), the time could not have been more propitious to take out the cancerous regime in Iran and hopefully allow the Iranian people to establish a decent administration. Will the Iranians rise to the challenge. Wish them all the luck.